User Interfaceīoth WPS Office and FreeOffice have a similar ribbon-style interface that many users will find familiar and intuitive, particularly those who are accustomed to Microsoft Office. In this article, we have the WPS Office in comparison with FreeOffice to help allow businesses and even individuals to decide what product will best suit their needs. What’s great about FreeOffice is its robust and rich features that make creating documents interesting. It offers three main applications: TextMaker for word processing, PlanMaker for spreadsheets, and Presentations for creating presentations. Meanwhile, FreeOffice is a free office suite developed by SoftMaker, which is a software company based in Germany. It is designed to be a cost-effective solution that is popular among a huge community who want the functionality of Office without the hefty price tag. WPS Office offers the major tools that nearly everyone needs including Writer, Spreadsheets, Presentation, and PDF Editor software. They are both packed with useful tools that help users yield maximum returns. The two most popular Office Suites include WPS Office and Free Office. For this reason, businesses consider opting for Office Suites that are more compatible with their organization’s needs and requirements. However, not all office suites deliver a similar quality of output which can break or make an organization’s reputation and impact their productivity overall. These tasks primarily include sharing documents, spreadsheets, and presentations with anyone inside or outside the organization. There are many popular office software suites that businesses consider that make a lot of their tasks accessible and easier. And in this fast-pacing digitalized world where accessibility and productivity are at their peak, businesses want to ensure that their productivity tools perform to their best capabilities. Some of us must have a foot in both worlds.Every business on this planet values productivity. LO works best when working with its native format. I sometimes work with messy docs emailed from China. Is the doc just for you? Are you sharing with an MS user? Are you sharing a PDF of your final work? But I have found that this works well: Create a bare-bones docx with the free version of Office 365, save it, and edit it as docx with LO from that point forward.Įach writer's needs will vary. LO's biggest opportunity for improvement (in my opinion) is MS compatibility. I won't use WPS's cloud feature b/c I don't trust its privacy. I don't like that it's proprietary and Chinese. I like WPS's MS-clone behavior and appearance. (WPS works well with complex documents created in China that I occasionally must work with niche, I know, but that's me.) I like and use both for different things. I'm a longtime LO user and a paid WPS license holder. When is LO going to get their act together and actually change the GUI to something modern and nice? I can post those if anyone is interested. ![]() options to get WPS to visually integrate. I'm even considering paying the $30 subscription for the windows version just to show support for Kingsoft.įor KDE users there are a few config. But I'm very happy to have found an alternative. It's disappointing that LO has so many people working on it and yet they don't seem to care about basic things such as text spacing and UI. The ribbon is very customisable, and it has some options that even MS Word lacks - such as if you drag an image into a document you can set the default text flow. And if you make the window large enough horizontally it will automatically switch to showing two pages side-by-side. I'm enjoying all the thoughtful touches, such as if you maximise the GUI the tab bar and window controls combine to the same vertical level giving you more space to work. There's also an "All in One" mode where presentations, documents, and spreadsheets all open in one window. In LO, even with the new Skia/Vulkan renderer, you get uneven letter spacing all over the place. Documents pop open instantantly (even on my humble laptop), it has a slick modern interface with tabbed UI, and handled the tick boxes in a form from my local dentist which LO ignored.Īnother major improvement is that the font spacing in WPS is perfect. So I grabbed WPS from the AUR (also available as a flatpak) and wow! It's everything I needed in an office suite. ![]() ![]() ![]() Recently I have been going through some old document folders, and was getting tired of how slowly they were loading in LibreOffice, and the general uglyness of the LO interface.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |